Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Since we are now on the bench, I decided to continue here. I started on the R2, using a Starliner engine and some Avanti engines bought on eBay. The background story is here: http://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/topic/117564-a-studebaker-story/#comment-1703106

The belt & pulley assembly is in place. It needed a bit more than the shim I mentioned earlier to make the alternator and compressor fit the pulleys. they are from different kits.

 

IMG_4661.JPG.ed604a626eca5f28addbd782d4a2c72f.JPG

IMG_4662.JPG.0a73845d001ee51cdcc0e056804f3d9e.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Here is a quick rundown to explain the differences between the different R engines, from an article by Doug Crall who looks like the expert on the matter.

R1-289 CID,10.5-1 compression, flat top pistons, 4barrel AFB, 260 degree cam. estimated 240hp.

R2-289 CID, 9.0-1 compression, flat top pistons, belt driven Paxton supercharger, AFB carb, Estimated 290-300hp

R3-304.5 CID, 276 or 288 degree cam, Paxton supercharger,non-sealed AFB carb inside a cast pressure box. Estimated 335hp. There were only 9 production R3s (all 64's) made by Paxton products , a division of Studebaker (Granatelli brothers). There are probably 20 or so factory built (crate engines) and another 50 or so built up to R3 specs.

R4-304.5 CID, 12.0-1 compression, Forged-true pistons, dual 4-barrel AFB carbs, same cam selection as R3. Only one production engine in a 64 Daytona. That engine has been restored.

1678446819_R42.JPG.d3b346afbcb002705e5c2b952b9b74ae.JPG

There was also  an R4 Daytona convertible created at the factory but lost to history. 

R5-By Andy Granatelli, not Studebaker, 304.5 CID. He called it Duo Cento because it was to do 200mph on the salt. Modified bendix FI. Dual Paxton superchargers. Estimated over 500hp.

That engine has also been restored. Apparently some of the parts were missing and had to be made.

R5.jpg.68e57f0860461cd8c04693f4bb4960a9.jpg

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

For modeling purposes, the only difference between the R2 and R3 is the air box. So I scaled down a photo of the top half to get the shape. It will have to be scratchbuilt.

1915987691_1963-studebakerr3pressurebox.jpg.983e304ea330dc4d83b66573e2374306.jpg

spacer.png

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Meanwhile the R2 is nearing completion. To finish the wiring, some touch-ups and a bit of detailing and it'll be done.

DSC_0203.JPG.463ee5f0ce59cfe2f76ebfcac8c0e244.JPG

DSC_0210.JPG.a9e73a62965730dbc35e9cb87ef282ce.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Took another tack with the spark plug wires. I had glued them to the plugs but they broke off when I tried to bend them towards the shield. I'll try the other way. Also started on the ignition shield for the other 3 engines.

IMG_4667.JPG.220d6f187373b5da894c1b49b9fd4528.JPG

 

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Worked better this way. They were anchored more solidly allowing manipulation without pulling off.

IMG_4668.JPG.198e445fdcb7a5a4c2014da2bf03fe60.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

For some reason I lost one of the manifolds. Made some from those on a junk engine.

IMG_4672.JPG.828d613ea1bba42e661cd011ab8c518d.JPG

IMG_4676.JPG.a5c6be12e22992d92c05092949af2d4c.JPG

It is slowly taking shape. I managed to smear my little R3 plaque. Will have to redo.

IMG_4673.JPG.13f4c99bf0b50ee293d1d6f5810f5e7a.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Made the crankcase breather and wrapped some wire around solder to make the air intake pipe.

IMG_4678.JPG.baa0a9c23cc525c1bc366e038b4e2a10.JPG

IMG_4679.JPG.a45922a22729a46aa04cc17b136a32cc.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

This will likely be the last update photos for a while as we just had a sewer backup which resulted in some flooding in the batroom next to my modeling room. Both will have to be stripped to get rid of the contamination.

 

 

spacer.png

spacer.png

spacer.png

 

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

The R3 is done. I see in the photos it'll need a few touchups, but it is pretty well there.

DSC_0207.JPG.b7f6504f3c79252bf1779041a0275482.JPG

DSC_0206.JPG.fea2f5509284bb40e139282222e7ade1.JPG

DSC_0205.JPG.377b859b7b7337f948af7f8c0437835f.JPG

DSC_0204.JPG.19c892910b88accef0b89209c3a4f126.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted

Engines are looking perfect. I feel your pain on the backup. Had this happen a few years ago and they had to remove sheet rock and base board moldings. The entire basement had to have new carpet thru out. Home owners insurance paid for it as the city would not take responsibility. Hope you have a better outcome.   

Posted

Engines are looking perfect. I feel your pain on the backup. Had this happen a few years ago and they had to remove sheet rock and base board moldings. The entire basement had to have new carpet thru out. Home owners insurance paid for it as the city would not take responsibility. Hope you have a better outcome.   

Thanks David. In my case, it wasn't the town, there was a blockage under the house somewhere. The subfloors have been removed, the cement scrubbed and sanitized, and the reconstruction should start next week. It is covered by the insurance. I would post a picture but Photobucket won't open again today.

Posted

Thanks David. In my case, it wasn't the town, there was a blockage under the house somewhere. The subfloors have been removed, the cement scrubbed and sanitized, and the reconstruction should start next week. It is covered by the insurance. I would post a picture but Photobucket won't open again today.

Ours was the cities fault. We have what they call Grinder Pumps to handle the sewer flow. This is maintained by the city, and the grinder and pump failed. There is an alarm that is suppose to sound but that was not wired properly. When the city took over our sewer system so that we could be annexed they put language in that the city could not be held responsible for damage caused by their neglects.     

Posted (edited)

This is really cool Pat. Love your garage/machine shop dio, really fantastic work.

Edited by Rider
Posted

Thanks guy for the nice words. On with the R4.The R4's dual four intake has a similar appearance to the single as far as runs go. So since kit R4 intakes are non existant I'll attempt to make one using a single four as a base.

The R4 also has a prominent valley cover. Found one in the scrap heap which would work with some trimming. Unfortunately it disappeared from the table later in the evening.

Started carving the carburetor bases out of a tapered block. This is to replicate the rake of the 1:1.

Posted (edited)

I scratched up another valley cover. My wife thinks the dog got the other one off the floor.

IMG_4699.JPG.13581e1c435db5852f032cda8d6350ee.JPG

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Tried my hand on the mini lathe with the milling attachment. The center groove went OK, the side scallops not so.

IMG_4703.JPG.f44c589cb10646582712eb1fc6008f02.JPG

IMG_4704.JPG.e9c48ad0c041b0e2fb2ae86141b007e1.JPG

Finished the engine top parts. Valley cover + stock intake + dual four slanted carb base + carbs.  

IMG_4707.JPG.b7013d142ab47de504b26747506cbf82.JPG

IMG_4708.JPG.613d3bfd4f5971d2a894392e728e6b6e.JPG

IMG_4709.JPG.2be806d3abf8c5a0e5828e58b063b140.JPG

 

Edited by landman
Posted (edited)

Installed the valley cover, manifold & carbs. Working on linkages and fuel lines.

 

IMG_4714.JPG.8be85c6a891eedb1dcc348cb9b7bc804.JPG

IMG_4713.JPG.87a5ff61d0e9fcfcfeae4e8eca8b66bb.JPG

Edited by landman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...