Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Bad Man 55 gasser


Jantrix

Recommended Posts

The biggest goof with the Badman kit was the side graphic boldly claiming "396 cu.in.", while the kit contained the same old small-block chevy engine from previous versions of the kit, thus your perception that the engine looks "too small" is correct in one way. It is fairly accurately scaled for a small-block, however, and most engines look small in those old cavernous engine bays, even big-blocks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did mine this way, although I started with the street machine kit and not an original Badman.

IMG_0171.jpg

IMG_0167.jpg

Still haven't finished the exhaust.

oldscool

Absolutely one of the best renditions of the monogram 55 that I have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest goof with the Badman kit was the side graphic boldly claiming "396 cu.in.", while the kit contained the same old small-block chevy engine from previous versions of the kit, thus your perception that the engine looks "too small" is correct in one way. It is fairly accurately scaled for a small-block, however, and most engines look small in those old cavernous engine bays, even big-blocks!

Or not, http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/engines-drivetrain/1102chp-396ci-small-block/ 1102chp-01-o%2B396ci-small-block%2Bengin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! These days, yep. Back in the days of this kit's first run - nope. Read the article, and it was the proliferation of 400 cranks with smaller main journals from the 80s that makes these strokers possible.

C'mon man, Monogram just threw us an old 283 because it was already on the tool. Shoulda been a 265 (slightly different) for 1955 anyway.

Snake, interesting note on that graphic. Would you happen to have a scan, or a link to share?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! These days, yep. Back in the days of this kit's first run - nope. Read the article, and it was the proliferation of 400 cranks with smaller main journals from the 80s that makes these strokers possible.

C'mon man, Monogram just threw us an old 283 because it was already on the tool. Shoulda been a 265 (slightly different) for 1955 anyway.

Snake, interesting note on that graphic. Would you happen to have a scan, or a link to share?

"Back in the Day" ? We were swapping out 283 cranks with 327's an back and forth to get all sorts of different configurations. Nothing "New". ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flatout, that's a sweet build of this old favorite.

Greg, I seem to have struck a nerve. That was unintentional. My point wasn't that you couldn't stroke and bore to your heart's content then or any other time, but you weren't going to land on 396 cubic inches with the available hardware from those days. Even the article that shows the 396ci engine doesn't explain how they got there, but talks about the typical 383 you get with a 400 crank in a 350 block.

Back to modeling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Deucebag" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA! (Even if he spelled it wrong.) :P

I am AMAZED I didn't think of that myself for one of my builds!

Thanks for brightening up a gloomy day! :lol:B)

Edited by Snake45
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Absolutely one of the best renditions of the monogram 55 that I have ever seen."

Thanks very much Dennis. There is an old WIP thread on this if you want to check it out. I made more mods than the pics show.

And I still haven't finished the exhausts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...