
Mark C.
Members-
Posts
264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Mark C.
-
Moebius 1/25 1964 Mercury Comet K-code
Mark C. replied to Justin Porter's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Yes, this is what I was wondering. Hope it has a flat hood in the box. Either way, I’ll get one, though. -
Coming Soon from Atomic City's JoHan line of new kits
Mark C. replied to thatz4u's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
There’s a whole lot of assumptions going on here that I don’t want to get into. All I will say, about my own personal opinion and nobody else’s, is that it always chafes me a little when I’m reading about a kit reissue, like for example, the recent and future Round 2 ‘clone’ kits (really excited about the upcoming Barracuda, Nomad, and Duster), and it’s something I’m really enthusiastic about, along with some other posters. Then someone who professes to know what modellers want, shoots it down, comparing it to Hasegawa, etc. or saying that it will never sell, and that Round 2 is dumb for doing this, and the only market for it is the five posters talking about it, etc etc. I don’t really understand the motivation to do this, unless those people really get off on being a buzz-kill, or just want to appear to be more knowledgeable than the rest of us. Whatever it is, it annoys the heck out of me, but I usually don’t say anything about it, as people are entitled to their opinions. I’m only adding my two cents now because it’s getting drug out and the same assertions are being made over and over. I mean it’s fine to offer an opinion, but really it’s (literally) Round 2’s or the iterations of Jo-Han, etc., business to figure out what to produce and sell. Our only job is to buy what we like, and let others buy what they like. I think what you’re talking about is what happens when people feel like they are being forced to defend why they like to build reissues or kits with simple chassis, etc., and then you’re jumping all over their defence, which is silly when you think about it. So, yeah, it gets old… and that’s all I’m going to say about it. -
perfect! Thank you!
-
Moebius 1/25 1964 Mercury Comet K-code
Mark C. replied to Justin Porter's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Nice! I never realized that the scooped hood was available on the regular Comet, but admittedly my knowledge of these cars is not extensive. Will definitely be getting this one! -
Thanks! Lots of work and parts sourcing in the wheels alone! Great work! Another quick question: what size tires are you using?
-
The Chrysler Norseman emerges from the depths...of my resin vat.
Mark C. replied to Pico's topic in WIP: Model Cars
Fascinating! It will be fun to watch this come together! -
Looking great so far. Where did you get the Pontiac baby moon hubcaps and wheels?
-
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I will take whatever Round 2 decides to give us. If they can squeeze out the Super Charger with minimal expense and effort, I will be happy and buy it. Otherwise my preference would be a Demon or Coronet style digital remaster. A stock version with crisp details will always be my preference. I don’t mind the simplified chassis, etc, the subject matter is king in my books. -
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Perfect! -
Revell (Monogram) 1/24th scale, 1985 Pontiac Fiero
Mark C. replied to Luc Janssens's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I find these stories immensely interesting but also gut wrenching. Thanks for the insider scoop, Bob! You should write a book! -
Phantom 1937 Cord 812 coupe - a classic that never was
Mark C. replied to mr moto's topic in Model Cars
Very sharp! Cord should have built these! -
The Chrysler Norseman emerges from the depths...of my resin vat.
Mark C. replied to Pico's topic in WIP: Model Cars
Very cool. Would love to know more about how this came about. Did you design the print yourself? The Norseman was a very cool show car until it met its salty match. -
Revell (Monogram) 1/24th scale, 1985 Pontiac Fiero
Mark C. replied to Luc Janssens's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Count me in on that. -
72 Jeepster. Anyone know anything about this coming out.
Mark C. replied to lvfd221's topic in Truck Kit News & Reviews
Have you heard rumours that it is coming out? -
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Don’t take this the wrong way, but IMHO that’s kind of a silly comment. It’s a model car, so the factory specs on its 440 (kit) engine are kind of non-important. Firstly, people tend to buy model kits of cars that they like the looks of. To my eye, the ‘73/‘74 Charger styling is very nice - it looks like it’s going fast just sitting on the shelf. However, if performance is important in this case, maybe it has an earlier 440 in it with all the good stuff applied. You could always add a six pack or a Hemi. Lots of options if you want it to be fast. But seriously, there are lots of 1970s and 1980s era models being reissued that would be just as anaemic as the Charger in question. Lots of heavy and slow Camaros, G-bodies, etc. But people are obviously buying them. TBH, I think it’s just best to say that you don’t like these cars and wouldn’t be interested in buying a kit of one than to attempt to create some sort of objective reason that Round 2 should not venture to bring this one back. Besides, in the end Round 2 will do what is best for their situation. In the meantime we can still have fun talking about it. -
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Yeah, I totally get where you’re coming from here. I was just tossing my 2 cents worth in, which isn’t worth a whole lot nowadays! -
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
As much as I am a fan of vintage NASCAR models, I have to agree that Salvinos has pretty much cornered the market on 1970s Chargers and Satellites/Road Runners. If it were my call, I would rather that Round 2 focuses their manpower and budgets on bringing out street versions of the Charger (and by extension, Road Runner). Then there are all those other languishing subjects that haven’t been brought back yet. I say leave the 1970s NASCAR Mopars to Salvinos (I’ll admit that I say it with trepidation, though, as they have recently priced themselves out of my budget until they bring out a new body, like a Magnum or Superbird, or some other subject that hasn’t been done, like a Montego, etc). Great thread! -
Thinkful Wishing about Round2 Models, future Kits.
Mark C. replied to stavanzer's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Which is why we must(!!!) have some cloned ‘65/‘66 Monaco/Polara kits hit the shelves again! Oops… not thread-appropriate! -
MPC Super Charger - 1974 Charger rundown
Mark C. replied to CapSat 6's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Great thread! It feels like I’ve been advocating for a reissue of this subject forever, so I’m glad that someone put forth the effort to report on it in such detail! Without knowing anything about processes, business cases, project priorities or market projections, I will say that my best case for this would be a cloned and improved version, as Round 2 have already shown us that they can do, but I would personally be fine with a straight reissue of the Super Charger with clear glass. Thanks for putting this together! -
Thinkful Wishing about Round2 Models, future Kits.
Mark C. replied to stavanzer's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
How about those ex-MPC NASCARS like the Cyclone, Torino, and Laguna that were reissued some 15ish years ago and not seen since? -
Thinkful Wishing about Round2 Models, future Kits.
Mark C. replied to stavanzer's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
I would like this as well, but would rather see them clone a ‘73 or ‘74 annual kit, as the Super Charger was an attempt at changing the Petty NASCAR back into a street car. A lot of the original engraving and detail was lost from the conversion of annual to NASCAR and then back to street car. However, if it’s just a matter of digging out the Super Charger tooling and squirting some styrene through it vs an expensive cloning project that might not happen, then yeah, bring back the Super Charger (IMHO of course). -
Hope you understand that there was no offence intended in my post. Just pointing out that in these days of economic and societal uncertainty, a “big picture” viewpoint is necessary. While I do understand that your intense interest in this subject matter would cause anyone to be hyper-focused on it, Steve reassured us that it has not been cancelled, and in the meantime there’s lots of other cool stuff in the works that we can look forward to. He also hinted that the whole tariff situation has the potential to blow up potential projects like this, but I will refrain from further comments to avoid the inevitable uncomfortable conversations that are sure to follow. That is my doom and gloom at the moment. IMHO, for older hobbyists, these are good times as we see companies investing in subjects that appeal to our tastes. As far as the kids go, they will find, and have found, their own niche, so in some ways, everybody’s happy, which is just fine by me.
-
Lots of doom and gloom, yet even a post by Round 2’s Steve G saying that it’s delayed, not cancelled or impossible, isn’t enough. I would suggest that we don’t give up hope, and just wait to see what comes. In the meantime, those of us who absolutely have to have one could get an old release from the auction site, or even get one of the 3D printed options that are already out there… just food for thought.
-
FWIW, I suspect the 3D print movement will eventually bring back much of the subject matter that once made Jo-Han special to a lot of modellers. There’s already some of it out there, and IMHO it’s making the Jo-Han debate kind of meaningless. I’m fine with that, as IMHO Jo-Han was really made special by the company it was and the guy that ran it. Keeping the name alive doesn’t really bring back the magic of the original Jo-Han, it just prolongs the agony. That said, I wish the ‘new Jo-Han’ all the success in the world.
-
I agree that we have no idea whether or not this is in Round 2’s list and where it may reside on that list. I hope it makes it, complete with ’72 parts, but personally am willing to be patient as there are already a number of future kits in their works that interest me. I’m just happy that we can talk about this as actually being a possibility for a future release. The hobby is so much more interesting and hopeful than it was a mere 10 years ago, IMHO.