Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It's one of the Renwall fantasy "1966" kits released in or about that year. I think there were about a half dozen of them of various long-dead marques--Deusenberg, Stutz, Mercer, and so forth. I'm not sure but this might be the Stutz. Or maybe Mercer. 

If you're not interested in it, I'm sure someone here is looking for it and will swap you something more to your liking for it. B)

ETA: There ya go! I see Bucky slipped in with the correct answer while I was typing. B)

Edited by Snake45
Posted

HAHA...we were prolly typing at the same time!

I have several Renwal kits on hand. The hardest to come by are the Jordan Playboy, and the Pierce Arrow. I don't have either of these two, and they go high on eBay.

Posted

IMHO......looks like...."leaberite"

leaberite....there.....ain't worth a $         :lol:

 

Posted

The designer ignored the fact that Packards were being built eight years before, only those were refried Studebakers...

Posted

I found that Packard as a built glue-bomb, cheap at a local flea market. It did still have the original box and the instruction sheet inside. You've probably noticed one of the...interesting things about that kit.  It's a 2-piece body, and that dividing line between the dark and light-green plastic is where the body is glued together.  The glue on mine was so old that it pretty much fell apart. 

Not sure if I'll try to restore it, or just leave it like it is as a fun historical artifact.  The box looks good on display in my workshop.

Posted
2 hours ago, Mike999 said:

I found that Packard as a built glue-bomb, cheap at a local flea market. It did still have the original box and the instruction sheet inside. You've probably noticed one of the...interesting things about that kit.  It's a 2-piece body, and that dividing line between the dark and light-green plastic is where the body is glued together.  The glue on mine was so old that it pretty much fell apart. 

Not sure if I'll try to restore it, or just leave it like it is as a fun historical artifact.  The box looks good on display in my workshop.

I noticed that 426Pack's is colored exactly the opposite of Bucky's. Pretty clever: Run the molds in light green, then run them in dark green, then switch half the sprues on every kit going out the door! Genius! 

Posted
17 hours ago, Bucky said:

These are the kits offered by Renwal for that time period:

renwal-570.jpg

Some of the designs are not bad.

They all look like they could be turned into some real cool looking builds. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Rider said:

They all look like they could be turned into some real cool looking builds. 

Some of them look like they'd make believable '70s "pimpmobiles." :lol:

I'm pretty sure I could make SOMETHING cool out the Bugatti, though--and probably the Mercer, too. B)

Posted
33 minutes ago, Snake45 said:

Some of them look like they'd make believable '70s "pimpmobiles." :lol:

I'm pretty sure I could make SOMETHING cool out the Bugatti, though--and probably the Mercer, too. B)

There was a prototype of the Bugatti:

bug101x12.jpg

http://www.madle.org/ebug.htm

Posted

These cars are awesome.

I'd love to have one and Superfly Pimp it out. It wouldn't be too much of a strectch to mod up a Lincoln MarkIV, or a MarkV to resemble one of these cars. I think I'd start with a MarkIV over a V only because the IV has softer lines then the V. 

Posted

That black Stutz is based on a '69 Pontiac Grand Prix. The Mercer is a reskinned Cobra. The Bugatti is a ground up on a real Bugatti chassis.

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

From the December 1963 issue of Esquire, these are Virgil Exner's four original renderings:

5bf4cfe8dea09_exnerduesenberg.jpg.16a29226a209b94c4cef65b54f9178a2.jpg

5bf4cfdd33b8f_exnerstutz.jpg.b9e4303183454b7788a5d89d68134550.jpg

5bf4cfeb4a853_exnermercer.jpg.c216f6a82ed16b4c81f232a28073b2e2.jpg

5bf4cfedb4c31_exnerpackard.jpg.cdc12acc9e39cd51d16151f9f30e7ac6.jpg

The article (note these were first supposed to be 1964 model year versions, plus they were credited to both Virgil Exner Senior and Junior):

exner1.jpg.be11b815cd591f2fc944f7987492910e.jpg

exner2.jpg.f4d29f987aaec6e26987769d3b4854a9.jpg

 

 

Edited by ChrisBcritter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...