Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

This looks like a very impressive kit. I have an built Model Factory Hiro version with driver and decals to build a James Dean replica. This USCP version looks superior in many respects like the interior, headlights, extensive photo-etch and chassis bottom detail. I like how you can see the spare tire under the louvers.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

I just received my Porsche from USCP today. It is a great looking kit. Overall casting is very nice. There is a little clean up on the panel lines and usual stuff like flash but appears no major work. Shipping from Ukraine March 1 and arrived March 8.

I'll post a couple photos when I get the kit down to the hobby room.

Edited by Erik Smith
Posted
10 hours ago, Erik Smith said:

I just received my Porsche from USCP today. It is a great looking kit. Overall casting is very nice. There is a little clean up on the panel lines and usual stuff like flash but appears no major work. Shipping from Ukraine March 1 and arrived March 8.

I'll post a couple photos when I get the kit down to the hobby room.

What is your plan for attaching the PE scripts, emblems, etc. to the body?

Posted
3 hours ago, afx said:

What is your plan for attaching the PE scripts, emblems, etc. to the body?

Plan is to use Future for Porsche and Spyder scripts. The engine vents hopefully will contour well enough to also use Future. We will see. 
I have a lot of research to do...
 

Posted

As received. 
There are a couple spots (the holes for rear engine vents) that need some delicate clean up from resin over flow or something. The dash/firewall assembly will need to be installed then body smoothed - in the photos it’s sitting loose and too high. You can see a little debris in panel lines. There is one very thin spot in the resin body - you can see the light through the front fender on driver side. 
The wheels and tires and brake drums are very nice. They could probably sell them separately. 

0C564DDE-571D-4474-A560-7D6BA2697D6A.jpeg

65206D47-B3DA-418C-833E-E0036D699F30.jpeg

25FBD3D7-A39A-499B-A08D-E4B19D9A6A5E.jpeg

D5E8DD3F-B84D-4855-96E5-A5CFF7E1DD70.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Few more:

888865E8-6928-4C7D-B7D4-AEE4C7CDC693.jpeg

03EE077E-BDC1-4CD0-A179-8BEC278FDA4D.jpeg

F99DB4B9-3351-46B0-BE47-10FE3C90DB3D.jpeg

0A4120B8-5084-41FE-9971-7BE16A428BA1.jpeg

There are two PE cards  this is the smaller of the two and is a little bit of a gold hue, which it appears the real cars had/have?

8EF8DE43-7998-45D9-8187-263C5655BED4.jpeg
nice little instruction  book  

BFD8AB2B-AB7C-43AE-A51D-9713B1785844.jpeg

Edited by Erik Smith
Posted (edited)

There are significant proportion, shape, and line problems with the kit shown in the photos...the one with the odd dash insert.

D5E8DD3F-B84D-4855-96E5-A5CFF7E1DD70.jpeg

Though the maker could possibly have pulled his dimensions from an unusual-bodied or rebodied post-crash car, the "standard" 550 Spyder looks rather different.

Just FYI: I've had a full-scale replica since 1995. The molds for my car were pulled from a real one that had never been wadded up.

A further FYI: I also have the Fernando Pinto kit, which actually looks like my big one.

One more FYI: The Jimmy Flintstone version is wonky too.

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Posted

Hi Guys,

  My 2 cents.....1: 1  Porsche is a 1955... kit instructions say car was modeled as a late 55-56

Obviously not a scientific comparison but wanted to see how it looked.

That dashboard insert thingy is a bit of a bummer...

IMG_1578.thumb.JPG.f02e5c180fdfd72ec4372281a7499ed6.JPG

 

IMG_1579.thumb.JPG.e1bda03f6bed62711f011aa480b1dd2a.JPG

 

IMG_1580.thumb.JPG.ba4ec880ddcb17e1b8f9989b89f9fa34.JPG

 

IMG_1582.thumb.JPG.5ec18c8b54152686712cd7951cdc49d0.JPG

 

IMG_1583.thumb.JPG.4e557f72ada1c07e285138b93eefc2a5.JPG

 

IMG_1585.thumb.JPG.b3f92f0b5459bffbf1f05ce202732952.JPG

 

IMG_1585.thumb.JPG.b3f92f0b5459bffbf1f05ce202732952.JPG

 

 

IMG_1586.thumb.JPG.6a74dce5d091c4033c84d6101056f7f5.JPG

 

IMG_1588.thumb.JPG.4f6a850c5997685e53147503c0280e2a.JPG

 

 

Posted

Just for what its worth some old time 1/24 versions. Left to right:

Flintstone resin

UMI resin - same as Flintstone

John Johnson - Teapot Graphics resin kit

CMC Diecast - w/ engine, doors, and bonnet opening

 

20210312_134010.jpg.84ace830f0c52e468316ba9e0436fdd6.jpg

20210312_134053.jpg.bc9926c73fdb464200ad14d763fb913a.jpg

Posted

The Flintstone version isn't terrible shape and line-wise, but it's got several symmetry problems, and the real cars were pretty well built as far as symmetry goes...much better than say, Cobras.

The Flintstone / UMI version also has a somewhat unusual bustle on the rear deck...not really "typical".

And though the Fernando Pinto version I have is a slightly later car with the gills on the rear quarters, the lines and proportions are very close to correct.

The Teapot Graphics version appears to be pretty good, but the length of the front hood opening and its relationship to the headlight buckets is entirely wrong on the CMC diecast.

Posted

Hey Ace, I seem to recall the bustle on the Flintstone/Umi version is based upon a 550 in a museum in Japan.  The Teapot version was said to have been based upon a Japanese toy.

Posted

I really appreciate all the feedback and critical eye on this subject. I am not at all familiar with the 550, so being able to see some of things through other eyes is great. 

Looking over the USCP product closer, it definitely has some funky lines. Some angles make them much more evident - I am thinking it is the rear fenders and the slope of the "trunk" lid. The very rear of the kit also appears to be a little too abrupt. As seen in some of Randy's photos above, it comes close at some angles. I will build it as is and try to focus the photographs of the better angles of the kit.

That Fernando Pinto kit looks very well proportioned.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

I can add some history to this.

The ACME 550A was a bootleg product. Long ago, (before internet) it was very difficult to acquire garage production resin kits from overseas. Japanese transactions were difficult due to language of course, and the prices were extraordinary, by ANY measure. Mike Q. and I made reproductions of resin bodies sourced from Japan. These were made available to a small circle of enthusiasts. The baseline subject 550A was indeed unique (rear deck bump) to a car in Japan.

The Flintstone product can be traced to ACME origins. Similarly, John Johnson (Teapot Graphics) developed his 550A kit from ACME origins.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...