Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

ICM Model T Ford 1913 Roadster


Anglia105E

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, David G. said:

Good progress on this David!

Making a fuel tank seems like a fun idea, something I would probably do too.

It must be a "David" thing. :D 

David G.

You and I seem to have a similar approach when it comes to scratch building ideas . . . See my next post for details of a slight change of plan . . .

David W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been a slight change of plan with the gas tank idea . . . I did go to all the trouble of scratch building the tank from a 35 mm length of solder container, which came out very nicely, only to find that the tank was too large for the car. The height of the tank was such that the seat could not fit onto the seat support panel . . . So, I got my thinking cap on, and came up with a better idea . . . Using a glue stick from my hot glue gun, I cut a 30 mm length of glue stick and painted this with Humbrol Aluminium enamel. Then I cut off a thin layer from one end of a piece of styrene sprue to make the filler cap for the gas tank.

The result is far better, and most importantly, the seat rests on the seat support and above the tank as it should. I am happy with the gas tank and it looks right.

Moving on to the three foot pedals, these have been mounted successfully . . . A piece of thin balsa wood was super glued in place on the back surface of the three slots, and the stalks of the three pedals were then super glued into recessed indentations on the balsa wood. I had seen a YouTube video where the model builder explained how the ICM instructions tell you to put the pedal stalks through the three slots and glue them to . . . what? Actually, there is nothing to glue the parts to at all, just empty space . . . My balsa wood idea seems to have worked well.

David

100_8925.JPG

100_8929.JPG

100_8931.JPG

100_8940.JPG

100_8942.JPG

100_8948.JPG

100_8957.JPG

100_8958.JPG

100_8963.JPG

100_8980.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fuel tank is as neat as neat can be, simple and tidy yet effective.

That is an odd thing about the directions for the pedals but I've occasionally seen strange omissions and errors in kit directions. I've always chalked it up to changes made late in the kit's development cycle.

In any case, a good solution to a minor issue.

David G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, David G. said:

The fuel tank is as neat as neat can be, simple and tidy yet effective.

That is an odd thing about the directions for the pedals but I've occasionally seen strange omissions and errors in kit directions. I've always chalked it up to changes made late in the kit's development cycle.

In any case, a good solution to a minor issue.

David G.

Funny thing is David, the glue stick idea for the fuel tank came to me immediately following the failure of the solder container material . . .

It always surprises me when ICM get something wrong, and usually such a basic error, when 99% of their instructions are spot on. Usually it is something so minor, such as the kit parts numbering, or perhaps left or right shown the wrong way round, but nothing to worry about unduly . . .

David W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LennyB said:

Nice recovery on the gas tank, I hate when you get so far with something and then have to back track and start again.

Didn’t you know that Modet T’s had magical floating pedals? I guess IMC short changed you on the pixie dust🧚‍♀️

The mildly irritating aspect of it was that my first attempt at the gas tank turned out really well, and then I realised I hadn't checked the height of the tank correctly . . . My carelessness !

Floating pedals . . . Now there's a thing . . .

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't usually post a photo of myself working inside the loft, but here is one that shows me having a coffee and a biscuit, while the outside temperatures are sub-zero . . . The foot pedals board is glued in place, and the upper body sides at the front edges are not the best fit just yet . . .

Now then gents . . . A major issue has surfaced, which has caught me out. The driver figure was purchased as one of two American Motorists by ICM in 1:24 scale . . . These figures are intended for the Touring version of the Model T Ford, but quite reasonably I thought, these should fit the Roadster version also . . . The driver figure does not fit into the driving seat of the car, and he appears too large. This is not just a small discrepancy, as the driver is 10 mm higher than the seat base and his left hand that should rest on the body side top edge, is also 10 mm too high. With his feet on the floor of the driver's compartment, there is no way that I can shorten the figure or modify the car . . .

As you can observe from the following series of photos, the box art shows the position of the driver, and how this relates to the position of the driver figure in the model car . . . I have made a point of checking the precise dimensions of the real Model T Ford, and they confirm that the Touring version has the same dimensions as the Roadster version, for width, height and length, apart from the Touring version being one foot longer overall . . .

I cannot understand why the driver figure by ICM does not even come close to fitting into the driver's seating position, and I am disappointed.

David

 

100_8986.JPG

100_8992.JPG

100_8993.JPG

100_8996.JPG

100_8998.JPG

100_8999.JPG

100_9000.JPG

100_9007.JPG

100_9009.JPG

100_9012.JPG

100_9018.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to tell from your photos for sure, but driver's left leg rests lower than his right leg.  Not sure how you might adjust the left leg higher, but that might make up a lot of the 10mm - might need to bend the ankles a bit too, to bring his backside forward a bit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BK9300 said:

Hard to tell from your photos for sure, but driver's left leg rests lower than his right leg.  Not sure how you might adjust the left leg higher, but that might make up a lot of the 10mm - might need to bend the ankles a bit too, to bring his backside forward a bit!

Certainly I will have a look at that possibility, Brian . . . I am open to any helpful suggestions regarding this problem.

Almost anything is worth a try at this stage !

This driver is going to have some manipulation ( gently ) . . .

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Brian on this one David. The left leg does seem to be the cause of at least some of the conflict. I would consider amputation of the left leg at the hip while leaving the coat as intact as possible. Doing that should reveal any changes that may need to be made regarding the right leg. 

Adjusting and reattaching everything will be a bother, to say the least. The good news is that once the figure is seated in place, most of the affected areas won't be readily seen.  

Or... you could remove both legs and just glue his bum directly to the seat and give him a lap blanket! :D 

May luck and skill be on your side!

Nice photo of you at the bench by the way.

David G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The windshield frame has been glued to the top edge of the firewall, but in doing so, the lower glass pane became unglued . . . Having refitted the lower screen, using Crystal Clear glue the assembly was put to one side to set overnight.

With the windshield in place, this looks more like a car now . . . Then I test fitted the canvas top and frame, which has enhanced the look of the car even further. One of the engineers is checking the carbide generator, while a second engineer is supervising . . .

I need to give the driver figure some thought, and along with some helpful suggestions by fellow MCM members I should be able to come up with some sort of idea . . . One involves using a hair dryer to heat up the area of the figure that I want to bend, and another idea involves cutting away part of the lower section of the figure. Maybe if I sleep on it, and take a fresh look tomorrow . . .

David

100_9022.JPG

100_9026.JPG

100_9037.JPG

100_9044.JPG

100_9045.JPG

100_9046.JPG

100_9047.JPG

100_9048.JPG

100_9050.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, David G. said:

Nice photos, it looks like you're planning a diorama.

David G.

Yes David, there will be a kind of diorama setting for the photography and the videos later, which will feature a background A3 print in B&W of the Highland Park Plant and also a Franklin Mint diecast 1927 Rolls-Royce Phantom I ( Fred Astaire ) . . . The Model T Ford will be rolling, hopefully ( fishing line ).

David W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice progress David, makes me want to build this thing. 

About the driver figure not fitting. I only built 1 model that came with a figure, and what I noticed was the seat cushion AND the driver's /rider's butt BOTH need to be in a " flattened state" to have correct geometry there.

In my case only the figure's bottom was flattened, not the seat (so the model - a motorbike - can be displayed without the rider.) In your case, similarly, the seat is not "pushed down" by the driver's weight, so to compensate, I would say at least half the figures thigh's underside has to be cut away. And the legs shortened, as it seems from your photos. The figure seems a little out of scale to me, but not sure.

Keep it up,

Csaba

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Csaba aka felhasznaaloo said:

Very nice progress David, makes me want to build this thing. 

About the driver figure not fitting. I only built 1 model that came with a figure, and what I noticed was the seat cushion AND the driver's /rider's butt BOTH need to be in a " flattened state" to have correct geometry there.

In my case only the figure's bottom was flattened, not the seat (so the model - a motorbike - can be displayed without the rider.) In your case, similarly, the seat is not "pushed down" by the driver's weight, so to compensate, I would say at least half the figures thigh's underside has to be cut away. And the legs shortened, as it seems from your photos. The figure seems a little out of scale to me, but not sure.

Keep it up,

Csaba

Thanks a lot Csaba . . . I think you are correct in saying that some of the material needs to be removed, to simulate the weight of the driver sitting on the seat cushion . . . Also, the legs will have to be shortened, as they are already too long, even before any cutting. My feeling is that the figure is probably out of scale, but this would be most unusual for a company like ICM, who nearly always get things absolutely 100% right . . .

David

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...